tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20984086.post4018148242555248758..comments2024-01-10T14:58:00.833-07:00Comments on Nameless Cynic: Fun with Christians II-BNameless Cynichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17963921060024737712noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20984086.post-76469438641297964142009-02-01T12:15:00.000-07:002009-02-01T12:15:00.000-07:00Well, to be honest, I haven't been losing any slee...Well, to be honest, I haven't been losing any sleep over it. But here. Let's move it into this forum.<BR/><BR/>I used, as my evidence, the actual Scripture of the Old Testament. But let's bring it down even further. Let's just go with the one simple question. Why do you feel that the rest of Leviticus should be ignored, the part that doesn't involve the dietary code, should be ignored, except for the part which <I>you claim</I> (despite the linguistic evidence) condemns homosexuality?<BR/><BR/>Cotton-polyester or wool-blend shirts (Lev 19:19)<BR/><BR/>Haircuts and shaving (Lev 19:27)<BR/><BR/>Killing teenagers for yelling at their parents. (Lev 20:9)<BR/><BR/>Can't approach the altar if you have a "defect in your sight." (Lev 21:20)<BR/><BR/>Just a couple of the ones I mentioned before, which you ignored entirely. Why are these things, also "breathed out by God," less important than the (mistranslated) stricture against homosexuality?Nameless Cynichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17963921060024737712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20984086.post-76477696075138769732009-02-01T09:49:00.000-07:002009-02-01T09:49:00.000-07:00Cynic,Just to set the record straight...I'm not ti...Cynic,<BR/>Just to set the record straight...<BR/><BR/>I'm not ticked, I'm not angry, and I'm not upset with you.<BR/><BR/>I think you didn't make your case, I think you asserted much with no actual evidence but had mistaken an assertion for an argument...but no, I'm not upset.Go Share Your Faithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10494251154976285819noreply@blogger.com